Today, August 7, the infamous James Holmes was sentenced to
life in prison instead of receiving the death penalty. Three years ago he
walked into a large movie theatre playing The
Dark Knight Rises, wielding tear gas,
a gas mask, 4 guns, and 700 rounds of ammunition. He shot and killed 12 people
as well as injuring 70 others. Two of the people that died were a little girl
and an unborn child. Their mother was permanently injured, confined to a
wheelchair.
The reason James Holmes received his
sentence was because the jury could not agree fully on giving him the death
sentence. Now, I don’t know what the judge’s stance on this was, but I believe
he would have to adhere to the jury’s verdict. So we’re going to look at the
jury. Why would someone honestly not be ok with giving this man the death
sentence? I myself am not a strong believer in the death sentence, but under
extreme circumstances like this one, I would be all for it. Apparently the
reason he received his sentence is because he appeared to be mentally insane in
his actions, thus leading some jury members to not be ok with killing a
severely disturbed person. Let me ask you this: Do you think this man should
live out the rest of his life, while he took so many innocent lives? In my
mind, there is absolutely no logical excuse as to not have this man put to
death. Well here’s just another example of cultural relativism. In many other
countries, this man would have had a much stricter punishment and it wouldn’t
have taken 3 years to come up with a verdict. “Cultural relativism is a
descriptive theory that states that different cultures have different moral
codes”. (Rosenstand, 2013)
References
Rosenstand, N. (2013). The Moral of the Story: An
Introduction to Ethics (7th ed., p. 125). New York, New York: McGraw
Hill.
BBC News. (2015, August 7). Colorado gunman James
Holmes sentenced to life in prison [Video
file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NbRoSfYj038